maemo.org Bugzilla – Bug 1562
Rating of applications if downloads should be for anonymous as well
Last modified: 2007-12-04 12:59:11 UTC
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Downloads. maemo. org has only a few applications that have been rated. I believe this is because you have to be logged in to be able to rate an application. It would be better to let even anonymous rate applications. Probably most of the end users don't have accounts anyway. And they are really the ones that need to evaluate how good they think the application is. There could also be a staff rating.
Rating open to anonymous users would open an easy door to misbehaviour. Of course you can still dope ratings with registered users but it more of a hassle for the dopers. But I agree with you on the problem of lack of rating. Let's find causes and solutions. Once we agree on them we will jump to action. Some ideas (bring your own): - Users have to login every time. Login just for voting makes many people lazy (including myself). If I would be already logged in I would mark stars easier. - There is no clear promotion of the ratings. Showing the top rated apps in the maemo.org homepage (say top 3) and the application catalog (say top 10) would probably help. - Also imagine that ratings and voplume of votes would be one more measure used by Nokia when deciding what applications to promote in Tableteer or what developers woukld deserve a discount code when a new device program arrives.
I agree that it is a bit easier to mess around anonymous votes, but it's quite easy to make normal users not to be able to vote twice: just add a voted cookie. Or, if you currently make a individual visitor cookie, just rely on that. Cookie is good enough level of 'security' for voting purposes. Always store the ip address of the vote as well. It's then easy to clean the vote database in case some individual tries to mess with the votes. Also, store the userid in the vote - that way you can separate registered votes from anonymous votes.
Well ok, sounds reasonable. And not conflicting with the rest of ideas to carry on anyway to promote the application catalog. Reassigning to Ferenc since he is collecting proposal for improvement of the catalog.
As just an idea, perhaps also the top 3 applications could be promoted on the tableteer web site. Also, it might be a good idea to include link to the maemo downloads page in the next firmware as default. That way even maemo n00bs would immediately know about it.
We are defining already a proposal to bridge the maemo application catalog with Tableteer. The link from the browser is a good idea. I won't push it until the catalog itself is in good shape, though. Let's reconsider this possibility in August, after the second round of improvements is done.
one approach would be to maintain two buckets of votes, one for anonymous votes and one for registered users. until a download receives a certain number of votes from registered users, show the anonymous score with some indication that it's from anonymous users. after it receives a certain number, switch to showing the registered user score. You can optionally show unregistered votes. of course, this approach assumed some sort of 1..5 rating scale. not a simple 0/+1 scale. As for how do compare votes for apps that have received a registered quota or are still ranked by unregistered users. I dunno. Perhaps a simple scale between the highest voted unregistered app and the 75% registered app. (Something like, if the top registered download has 100 votes the bottom of the top quartile has 40 votes, and the top unregistered has 50 votes, then 5 votes are worth 4, and a download w/ 20 unregistered votes is worth 16.)
This is implemented in the new catalog which will be launched soon.
Great! Looking forward to it. Good stuff!
Closing FIXED bugs. if error/problem still occurs, please reopen bug with comments.