Bug 11752 - overwriting of values in certain fields in 0.8.7
: overwriting of values in certain fields in 0.8.7
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 5452
Product: Hermes
General
: unspecified
: N900 Maemo
: Unspecified enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: unassigned
: general
:
:
:
:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2011-01-08 08:44 UTC by Sony K. Philip
Modified: 2011-01-08 10:37 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:


Attachments


Note

You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Description Sony K. Philip (reporter) 2011-01-08 08:44:15 UTC
SOFTWARE VERSION: 
(Settings > General > About product)
OSSO_PRODUCT_HARDWARE='RX-51'
OSSO_PRODUCT_NAME='N900'
OSSO_PRODUCT_FULL_NAME='Nokia N900'
OSSO_PRODUCT_RELEASE_NAME='Maemo 5'
OSSO_PRODUCT_RELEASE_FULL_NAME='Maemo 5'
OSSO_PRODUCT_RELEASE_VERSION='20.2010.36-2'
OSSO_PRODUCT_WLAN_CHANNEL='fcc/us'
OSSO_PRODUCT_KEYBOARD='English, Dutch'
OSSO_PRODUCT_REGION='Britain'
OSSO_PRODUCT_SHORT_NAME='Nokia N900'
OSSO_VERSION='RX-51_2009SE_20.2010.36-2_PR_MR0'


EXACT STEPS LEADING TO PROBLEM: 
(Explain in detail what you do (e.g. tap on OK) and what you see (e.g. message
Connection Failed appears))
1. On update of contacts
* Avatar/Picture is taken from linked-in profile and overrides facebook picture
* Nicknames get overwritten with the twitter username


EXPECTED OUTCOME: 
Nickname and avatar should not get overwritten unless specifically asked for.

ACTUAL OUTCOME: 
* Avatar/Picture is taken from linked-in profile and overrides facebook picture
* Nicknames get overwritten with the twitter username

REPRODUCIBILITY: always
(always, less than 1/10, 5/10, 9/10)

OTHER COMMENTS:
I have not tried 0.8.9 since it doesn't connect as filed in
https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11751

It would have been nice if we could choose the mapping from the service to
contact field for profile pic and nickname before updating.
Comment 1 Andrew Flegg maemo.org 2011-01-08 10:37:57 UTC
I'm assuming in step 1 you clicked "Refresh", rather than "Retrieve". If so,
this is intended behaviour. However, the wording is confusing and discussion is
happening under bug #5452 - and can be tracked there.

I don't use "Refresh" much myself, so suggestions on how it could be improved
would be appreciated on #5452: perhaps it does need a dialogue allowing you to
select fields and whether or not they are updated in "Refresh" mode.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 5452 ***