maemo.org Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||Streamlining user access to the Extras repository|
|Product:||[Maemo Official Applications] Settings and Maintenance||Reporter:||Ryan Abel <rabelg5>|
|Component:||Application manager||Assignee:||Quim Gil <quim.gil>|
|Status:||VERIFIED FIXED||QA Contact:||application-manager-bugs|
|Priority:||Medium||CC:||andrew, andre_klapper, quim.gil|
Currently, Nokia ships new tablets with the Extras repository configured, but disabled. Although this practice may indemnify Nokia against liability based on the quality of the packages in Extras, it also negatively impacts the tablet user experience, by greatly increasing the difficulty of access to the third-party applications which are such a crucial part of that experience. The most straightforward solution to this issue (from a technical perspective, anyway) is to simply ship the tablets with the Extras repository enabled and call it a day. Unfortunately, this is probably not acceptable to Nokia legal, so we have a few other possible approaches to the issue which may be more acceptable. A very visible and effective option (thanks to sjgadsby for this one), is to add another step to the initial setup wizard that summarizes the benefits of enabling Extras, offers to enable Extras for the user, and carries a health warning and disclaimer clearing Nokia of all liability (much like the existing disclaiming in Application manager that is show when installing software) for the quality of the packages in Extras. Thus, new users are introduced to Extras without the need to go digging for it on their own, and Nokia legal should be happy with their liability standing. A similar option to the setup-wizard one, is to add a small segment onto the Home Tutorial Flash movie that summarizes the benefits of Extras and shows the user how to go about enabling it. This is markedly less visible (be interesting to know what percentage of users watch the Tutorial movie) than the setup-wizard option, but may be worth implementing additionally or as an alternative to it. On a slightly different approach, the new buttons for the main view of Application manager covered here (http://wiki.maemo.org/User:GeneralAntilles/Improving_the_Application_manager#Main_view) is another possible approach to introducing new users to Extras. Any way you look at it (and especially with the improving quality of Extras moving forward thanks to the hard work of X-Fade and others), Extras is an important part of the tablet experience and needs to be visible to the new user, not hidden away behind several menus and dialogs. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.18 (KHTML, like Gecko, Safari/525.20) OmniWeb/v618.104.22.168362
(In reply to comment #0) > The most straightforward solution to this issue (from a technical perspective, > anyway) is to simply ship the tablets with the Extras repository enabled and > call it a day. Unfortunately, this is probably not acceptable to Nokia legal, Maybe Quim can comment on this so we know what's possible and what's not?
Note that mthe cause here is Nokia promoting a lot or a little the extras repository. The Application Manager implementation just reflects the implementation of that. To me this sounds more a 2010 objective than a specific enhancement request for the A.M. As a principle, it is clear that Nokia wants to promote additional software to its customers. If it's free of charge, community based, open source... al the better - it just fits with the kind of products the Maemo platform should be excel at. However, Nokia doesn't want to take any risk, not only in terms of legal liabilities, also in terms of bad user experience through i.e. problematic installs, crashes, damages in system performance, bad interfaces, incomplete features... If the community can get a decent quality filter in extras and produce a bunch of amazing applications as good as or better than the ones proviced by Nokia and commercial partners, then the community repository will be promoted very visibly. It's not a passive requirement: Nokia is willing to help achieving that. Now the help goes through the device programs and funding and pushing some of the work on the extras and /downloads improvements. In the future Nokia can help on more things i.e. helping out selected projects to get that 15% remaining to achieve mass market quality. It's a good time to talk about this. No big changes will be seen for Diablo beyond the extras-devel/extras setting, since this was the main objective for this release. New things can be planned and executed pointing to Fremantle and Harmattan.
The current situation is: If the Maemo community is able to put a decent QA process in place for Extras, then Nokia will trust it and enable this reository by default. This is the desired scenario for everybody, but requires work (and Nokia is willing to help e.g. funding the work needed). If the Maemo 5 Extras repository is proven to contain software problematic for pure end users and has not a reliable QA process then the default way for users to get that repository installed will be to install one app from that repo (advertized in maemo.nokia.com, maemo.org or wherever else) and then activate the repository. So let's work on this QA process since it's what all of us want to have in place.
(In reply to comment #3) > If the Maemo community is able to put a decent QA process in place for Extras, > then Nokia will trust it and enable this reository by default. This is the > desired scenario for everybody, but requires work (and Nokia is willing to help > e.g. funding the work needed). > Any chance of a status update here? Currently still disabled in 41-10.
This will not happen for the final Fremantle version, but can be considered for an SSU update as far as I remember the discussion about this.
Basically Extras needs to proof that the QA works and there is relevant content for end users. The work done so far is very good! We are looking forward to get more stable software there now that 300 users with N900 and without NDA have been encouraged to test and give feedback. I can't give details about releases but I believe that pushing Extras hard these days will help having it _basically_ enabled by the time the first wave of N900 users get their devices.
(In reply to comment #6) > Basically Extras needs to proof that the QA works and there is relevant content > for end users. > Can we get some Nokia input on this, then? > I can't give details about releases but I believe that pushing Extras hard > these days will help having it _basically_ enabled by the time the first wave > of N900 users get their devices. > What does "basically" mean? It's either enabled or it isn't. . . .
(In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > Basically Extras needs to proof that the QA works and there is relevant > > content for end users. > > Can we get some Nokia input on this, then? And what factors we need to meet to show it "working"? > > I can't give details about releases but I believe that pushing Extras hard > > these days will help having it _basically_ enabled by the time the first wave > > of N900 users get their devices. > > > > What does "basically" mean? It's either enabled or it isn't. . . . Latest comment from Quim suggest it *isn't*: http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p=356591&postcount=58
More explanations at http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p=356691&postcount=72 Extras is doing the right thing already and only needs to continue adding good quality software.
The "maemo.org Applications" repository will be enabled by default in the first maintenance release. This is a way to say Congratulations for the great work done with the Extras-testing QA process and the 50 applications available at http://maemo.org/downloads/Maemo5/ by the N900 sales start.
FIXED in Fremantle PR1.1.
The problem reported here should be fixed in the update released today for public: The Maemo5 update version 2.2009.51-1 (also called "PR1.1" sometimes). Please leave a comment if the problem is not fixed for you in this update version.