Community Council/Counting methods
m (→Proposed options: Correcting grammar) |
(Categorization) |
||
| (One intermediate revision not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
To vote, please visit [http://maemo.org/vote the voting page]. | To vote, please visit [http://maemo.org/vote the voting page]. | ||
| - | |||
== Proposed options == | == Proposed options == | ||
| Line 20: | Line 19: | ||
# '''None of the above.''' | # '''None of the above.''' | ||
#* This option allows you to indicate that you think none of the options is satisfactory. | #* This option allows you to indicate that you think none of the options is satisfactory. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Community]] | ||
Latest revision as of 10:11, 21 April 2009
The following referendum is to decide which method will be used to decide winners of Maemo Community Council elections. Three options are proposed: first past the post, single transferable vote and reweighted range voting.
To vote, please visit the voting page.
[edit] Proposed options
The changes mentioned below will be made to items #4 and #5 in the Council election process.
- No change ("first-five-candidates-past-the-post")
- A single transferrable vote system (rank your preferred candidates) [council preferred option]
- Item #4 becomes "Each community member eligible to vote gets a single ballot."
- Item #5 becomes "The 5 nominees voted for most, as counted by a single transferrable vote system are elected."
- This option is preferred by the Maemo Community Council as being easiest to understand and gives a satisfactory outcome.
- A reweighted range voting system (give each candidate a score 0-100)
- None of the above.
- This option allows you to indicate that you think none of the options is satisfactory.
- This page was last modified on 21 April 2009, at 10:11.
- This page has been accessed 25,166 times.