Task:Package categories - Revision history

mrsellout: Undo revision 51272 by 180.194.171.229 (Talk)(Revert to pre-spam revision)

mrsellout — Sat, 06 Apr 2013 10:06:45 GMT

Undo revision 51272 by 180.194.171.229 (Talk)(Revert to pre-spam revision)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:06, 6 April 2013
Line 6:		Line 6:
	This proposal is coordinated by [[User:Xfade\|Niels Breet]] and is part of the [[Extras_repository_process_definition\|Extras repository process definition]].		This proposal is coordinated by [[User:Xfade\|Niels Breet]] and is part of the [[Extras_repository_process_definition\|Extras repository process definition]].

-
-	~~'''''[http://www.triond.com/users/pinnaclelawsuit Pinnacle Lawsuit Blog]'''''~~

	== Problem ==		== Problem ==

180.194.171.229 at 16:13, 5 April 2013

180.194.171.229 — Fri, 05 Apr 2013 16:13:02 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:13, 5 April 2013
Line 6:		Line 6:
	This proposal is coordinated by [[User:Xfade\|Niels Breet]] and is part of the [[Extras_repository_process_definition\|Extras repository process definition]].		This proposal is coordinated by [[User:Xfade\|Niels Breet]] and is part of the [[Extras_repository_process_definition\|Extras repository process definition]].

		+
		+	'''''[http://www.triond.com/users/pinnaclelawsuit Pinnacle Lawsuit Blog]'''''

	== Problem ==		== Problem ==

mrsellout: Removed spam links.

mrsellout — Thu, 04 Apr 2013 21:42:50 GMT

Removed spam links.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:42, 4 April 2013
Line 6:		Line 6:
	This proposal is coordinated by [[User:Xfade\|Niels Breet]] and is part of the [[Extras_repository_process_definition\|Extras repository process definition]].		This proposal is coordinated by [[User:Xfade\|Niels Breet]] and is part of the [[Extras_repository_process_definition\|Extras repository process definition]].

-
-	~~Don't Erase it: [http://www.triond.com/users/pinnaclelawsuit Pinnacle Lawsuit Blog]~~

	== Problem ==		== Problem ==
Line 103:		Line 101:
	As stated on the [http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/faceted.html debtags website]:		As stated on the [http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/faceted.html debtags website]:

-	{{quotation\|Drawing a bit freely from the literature of Faceted Classification, a facet is a group of tags which describe the same quality of a package. Package Tags are organized in Facets, that represent different points of view from which to look at the package archive. For example, you could have a "Usage" facet with tags about what a program is intended to be used for, or you could have a "Media" facet with tags about what kind of information a program is able to process, a "Technology" facet about the technology a package uses, and so on. With this approach, every tag is situated in a specific context, and has a clear meaning. Also, tags from different facets shed light on packages from different points of view, giving "depth" to its categorization. Take something tagged with "Use::Chatting", "Technology::IRC", "Role::Server": it has a remarkable level of detail, and tells almost everything we need to know about what the package does.~~[http://www.wayankatel.com Informasi Blog Pendidikan]}}~~	+	{{quotation\|Drawing a bit freely from the literature of Faceted Classification, a facet is a group of tags which describe the same quality of a package. Package Tags are organized in Facets, that represent different points of view from which to look at the package archive. For example, you could have a "Usage" facet with tags about what a program is intended to be used for, or you could have a "Media" facet with tags about what kind of information a program is able to process, a "Technology" facet about the technology a package uses, and so on. With this approach, every tag is situated in a specific context, and has a clear meaning. Also, tags from different facets shed light on packages from different points of view, giving "depth" to its categorization. Take something tagged with "Use::Chatting", "Technology::IRC", "Role::Server": it has a remarkable level of detail, and tells almost everything we need to know about what the package does.

	=== Application-specific subcategories ===		=== Application-specific subcategories ===

180.194.171.3 at 18:19, 4 April 2013

180.194.171.3 — Thu, 04 Apr 2013 18:19:17 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:19, 4 April 2013
Line 5:		Line 5:

	This proposal is coordinated by [[User:Xfade\|Niels Breet]] and is part of the [[Extras_repository_process_definition\|Extras repository process definition]].		This proposal is coordinated by [[User:Xfade\|Niels Breet]] and is part of the [[Extras_repository_process_definition\|Extras repository process definition]].
		+
		+
		+	Don't Erase it: [http://www.triond.com/users/pinnaclelawsuit Pinnacle Lawsuit Blog]

	== Problem ==		== Problem ==

mrsellout: Undo revision 51255 by 180.194.169.157 (Talk)(Removed spam)

mrsellout — Thu, 04 Apr 2013 17:28:53 GMT

Undo revision 51255 by 180.194.169.157 (Talk)(Removed spam)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:28, 4 April 2013
Line 100:		Line 100:
	As stated on the [http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/faceted.html debtags website]:		As stated on the [http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/faceted.html debtags website]:

-	{{quotation\|Drawing a bit freely from the literature of Faceted Classification, a facet is a group of tags which describe the same quality of a package. Package Tags are organized in Facets, that represent different points of view from which to look at the package archive. For example, you could have a "Usage" facet with tags about what a program is intended to be used for, or you could have a "Media" facet with tags about what kind of information a program is able to process, a "Technology" facet about the technology a package uses, and so on.	+	{{quotation\|Drawing a bit freely from the literature of Faceted Classification, a facet is a group of tags which describe the same quality of a package. Package Tags are organized in Facets, that represent different points of view from which to look at the package archive. For example, you could have a "Usage" facet with tags about what a program is intended to be used for, or you could have a "Media" facet with tags about what kind of information a program is able to process, a "Technology" facet about the technology a package uses, and so on. With this approach, every tag is situated in a specific context, and has a clear meaning. Also, tags from different facets shed light on packages from different points of view, giving "depth" to its categorization. Take something tagged with "Use::Chatting", "Technology::IRC", "Role::Server": it has a remarkable level of detail, and tells almost everything we need to know about what the package does.[http://www.wayankatel.com Informasi Blog Pendidikan]}}
-	~~[http://www.triond.com/users/pinnaclelawsuit Pinnacle Lawsuit Blog]~~	+
-	With this approach, every tag is situated in a specific context, and has a clear meaning. Also, tags from different facets shed light on packages from different points of view, giving "depth" to its categorization. Take something tagged with "Use::Chatting", "Technology::IRC", "Role::Server": it has a remarkable level of detail, and tells almost everything we need to know about what the package does.[http://www.wayankatel.com Informasi Blog Pendidikan]}}	+

	=== Application-specific subcategories ===		=== Application-specific subcategories ===

180.194.169.157 at 16:19, 4 April 2013

180.194.169.157 — Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:19:03 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:19, 4 April 2013
Line 100:		Line 100:
	As stated on the [http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/faceted.html debtags website]:		As stated on the [http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/faceted.html debtags website]:

-	{{quotation\|Drawing a bit freely from the literature of Faceted Classification, a facet is a group of tags which describe the same quality of a package. Package Tags are organized in Facets, that represent different points of view from which to look at the package archive. For example, you could have a "Usage" facet with tags about what a program is intended to be used for, or you could have a "Media" facet with tags about what kind of information a program is able to process, a "Technology" facet about the technology a package uses, and so on. With this approach, every tag is situated in a specific context, and has a clear meaning. Also, tags from different facets shed light on packages from different points of view, giving "depth" to its categorization. Take something tagged with "Use::Chatting", "Technology::IRC", "Role::Server": it has a remarkable level of detail, and tells almost everything we need to know about what the package does.[http://www.wayankatel.com Informasi Blog Pendidikan]}}	+	{{quotation\|Drawing a bit freely from the literature of Faceted Classification, a facet is a group of tags which describe the same quality of a package. Package Tags are organized in Facets, that represent different points of view from which to look at the package archive. For example, you could have a "Usage" facet with tags about what a program is intended to be used for, or you could have a "Media" facet with tags about what kind of information a program is able to process, a "Technology" facet about the technology a package uses, and so on.
		+	[http://www.triond.com/users/pinnaclelawsuit Pinnacle Lawsuit Blog]
		+	With this approach, every tag is situated in a specific context, and has a clear meaning. Also, tags from different facets shed light on packages from different points of view, giving "depth" to its categorization. Take something tagged with "Use::Chatting", "Technology::IRC", "Role::Server": it has a remarkable level of detail, and tells almost everything we need to know about what the package does.[http://www.wayankatel.com Informasi Blog Pendidikan]}}

	=== Application-specific subcategories ===		=== Application-specific subcategories ===

mrsellout: Undo revision 50923 by 180.194.171.159 (Talk) Removed Spam

mrsellout — Fri, 08 Feb 2013 15:01:54 GMT

Undo revision 50923 by 180.194.171.159 (Talk) Removed Spam

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:01, 8 February 2013
Line 8:		Line 8:
	== Problem ==		== Problem ==

-	People feel the need to create new categories, because the current list is too limited. ~~[http://fosamaxclassactionlawsuit.zoomshare.com/ Fosamax Class Action Lawsuit News Update]~~	+	People feel the need to create new categories, because the current list is too limited.

	Another problem is that some categories aren't very descriptive. What applications go in to tools, support or accessories?		Another problem is that some categories aren't very descriptive. What applications go in to tools, support or accessories?

180.194.171.159: /* Problem */

180.194.171.159 — Thu, 07 Feb 2013 19:02:41 GMT

Problem

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:02, 7 February 2013
Line 8:		Line 8:
	== Problem ==		== Problem ==

-	People feel the need to create new categories, because the current list is too limited.	+	People feel the need to create new categories, because the current list is too limited. [http://fosamaxclassactionlawsuit.zoomshare.com/ Fosamax Class Action Lawsuit News Update]

	Another problem is that some categories aren't very descriptive. What applications go in to tools, support or accessories?		Another problem is that some categories aren't very descriptive. What applications go in to tools, support or accessories?

118.97.95.238: /* Debtags */

118.97.95.238 — Tue, 02 Oct 2012 07:53:05 GMT

Debtags

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:53, 2 October 2012
Line 100:		Line 100:
	As stated on the [http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/faceted.html debtags website]:		As stated on the [http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/faceted.html debtags website]:

-	{{quotation\|Drawing a bit freely from the literature of Faceted Classification, a facet is a group of tags which describe the same quality of a package. Package Tags are organized in Facets, that represent different points of view from which to look at the package archive. For example, you could have a "Usage" facet with tags about what a program is intended to be used for, or you could have a "Media" facet with tags about what kind of information a program is able to process, a "Technology" facet about the technology a package uses, and so on. With this approach, every tag is situated in a specific context, and has a clear meaning. Also, tags from different facets shed light on packages from different points of view, giving "depth" to its categorization. Take something tagged with "Use::Chatting", "Technology::IRC", "Role::Server": it has a remarkable level of detail, and tells almost everything we need to know about what the package does.}}	+	{{quotation\|Drawing a bit freely from the literature of Faceted Classification, a facet is a group of tags which describe the same quality of a package. Package Tags are organized in Facets, that represent different points of view from which to look at the package archive. For example, you could have a "Usage" facet with tags about what a program is intended to be used for, or you could have a "Media" facet with tags about what kind of information a program is able to process, a "Technology" facet about the technology a package uses, and so on. With this approach, every tag is situated in a specific context, and has a clear meaning. Also, tags from different facets shed light on packages from different points of view, giving "depth" to its categorization. Take something tagged with "Use::Chatting", "Technology::IRC", "Role::Server": it has a remarkable level of detail, and tells almost everything we need to know about what the package does.[http://www.wayankatel.com Informasi Blog Pendidikan]}}

	=== Application-specific subcategories ===		=== Application-specific subcategories ===

andre: Undo revision 46524 by Casinostars (Talk)

andre — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:39:18 GMT

Undo revision 46524 by Casinostars (Talk)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:39, 27 January 2012
Line 2:		Line 2:


-	This wiki page serves as a discussion page for improving the categorization system used for Maemo packages. Improvements here will be pushed to the [http://maemo.org/forrest-images/pdf/maemo-policy.pdf Maemo Packaging Policy] through [[Task:Packaging policy proposed changes]] ~~[http://argosycasinokansascities.com/ Argosy casino kansas city]~~	+	This wiki page serves as a discussion page for improving the categorization system used for Maemo packages. Improvements here will be pushed to the [http://maemo.org/forrest-images/pdf/maemo-policy.pdf Maemo Packaging Policy] through [[Task:Packaging policy proposed changes]].
-	.	+

-	This proposal is coordinated by [[User:Xfade\|Niels Breet]] and is part of the [[Extras_repository_process_definition\|Extras repository process definition]] ~~[http://bicycle-casinos.com/ Bicycle casino]~~	+	This proposal is coordinated by [[User:Xfade\|Niels Breet]] and is part of the [[Extras_repository_process_definition\|Extras repository process definition]].
-	.	+

	== Problem ==		== Problem ==

-	People feel the need to create new categories, because the current list is too limited ~~[http://bluechipcasinos.net/ Blue chip casino]~~	+	People feel the need to create new categories, because the current list is too limited.
-	.	+

-	Another problem is that some categories aren't very descriptive. What applications go in to tools, support or accessories ~~[http://bodog-casinos.com/ Bodog casino]~~	+	Another problem is that some categories aren't very descriptive. What applications go in to tools, support or accessories?
-	?	+

	== Maemo Packaging Policy ==		== Maemo Packaging Policy ==

-	The current [http://maemo.org/forrest-images/pdf/maemo-policy.pdf Maemo Packaging Policy] lists ~~[http://casino-del-sol.net/ casino del sol]~~	+	The current [http://maemo.org/forrest-images/pdf/maemo-policy.pdf Maemo Packaging Policy] lists the following sections:
-	the following sections:	+

	* accessories		* accessories
Line 31:		Line 26:
	* themes		* themes
	* tools		* tools
-	* [http://casino-royale-lasvegas.com/ casino royale las vegas]
-

	== New list for Diablo ==		== New list for Diablo ==

-	This is the [http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail//maemo-developers/2008-October/035437.html final] list for Diablo ~~[http://clams-casino.net/ clams casino]~~	+	This is the [http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail//maemo-developers/2008-October/035437.html final] list for Diablo:
-	:	+

	{\| class="wikitable"		{\| class="wikitable"
Line 94:		Line 86:
	\|}		\|}

-	If the package's section starts "user/", but is not any of the above ~~[http://clearwatercasinos.com/ clear water casino]~~	+	If the package's section starts "user/", but is not any of the above, the ''Application Manager'' forces them into an "Other" section.
-	, the ''Application Manager'' forces them into an "Other" section.	+

	== Future additions ==		== Future additions ==
Line 101:		Line 92:
	The current proposed list is only for Diablo, future additions and changes will be considered for Fremantle.		The current proposed list is only for Diablo, future additions and changes will be considered for Fremantle.

-	It seems H-A-M supports (will support?) the section "user/hidden" in the future ([http://maemo.gitorious.org/hildon-application-manager/mainline/commit/deeb9558129e22f9d1ca49ef9b6565a173603fcd commit log]). This section will not be shown in the "Download" view, but will be shown in the "Update" and "Uninstall" views ~~[http://commerce-casino.com/ commerce casino]~~	+	It seems H-A-M supports (will support?) the section "user/hidden" in the future ([http://maemo.gitorious.org/hildon-application-manager/mainline/commit/deeb9558129e22f9d1ca49ef9b6565a173603fcd commit log]). This section will not be shown in the "Download" view, but will be shown in the "Update" and "Uninstall" views.
-	.	+

	=== Debtags ===		=== Debtags ===
Line 110:		Line 100:
	As stated on the [http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/faceted.html debtags website]:		As stated on the [http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/faceted.html debtags website]:

-	{{quotation\|Drawing a bit freely from the literature of Faceted Classification, a facet is a group of tags which describe the same quality of a package. Package Tags are organized in Facets, that represent different points of view from which to look at the package archive. For example, you could have a "Usage" facet with tags about what a program is intended to be used for, or you could have a "Media" facet with tags about what kind of information a program is able to process, a "Technology" facet about the technology a package uses, and so on ~~[http://desplainescasinos.net/ DES PLAINES CASINO]~~	+	{{quotation\|Drawing a bit freely from the literature of Faceted Classification, a facet is a group of tags which describe the same quality of a package. Package Tags are organized in Facets, that represent different points of view from which to look at the package archive. For example, you could have a "Usage" facet with tags about what a program is intended to be used for, or you could have a "Media" facet with tags about what kind of information a program is able to process, a "Technology" facet about the technology a package uses, and so on. With this approach, every tag is situated in a specific context, and has a clear meaning. Also, tags from different facets shed light on packages from different points of view, giving "depth" to its categorization. Take something tagged with "Use::Chatting", "Technology::IRC", "Role::Server": it has a remarkable level of detail, and tells almost everything we need to know about what the package does.}}
-	. With this approach, every tag is situated in a specific context, and has a clear meaning. Also, tags from different facets shed light on packages from different points of view, giving "depth" to its categorization. Take something tagged with "Use::Chatting", "Technology::IRC", "Role::Server": it has a remarkable level of detail, and tells almost everything we need to know about what the package does.}}	+

	=== Application-specific subcategories ===		=== Application-specific subcategories ===